达诚基金一日8只产品“大换血”,新生代“硬刚”市场挑战?
Hua Xia Shi Bao·2025-12-04 05:33

Core Viewpoint - Dachen Fund has made significant changes in its management team, with two fund managers resigning from all their managed funds, raising concerns about the stability and continuity of the investment team [2][3]. Group 1: Management Changes - Dachen Fund announced the resignation of fund managers Wu Haoyang and Chen Ji due to personal reasons, affecting a total of eight funds, including four equity and four fixed-income products [3][5]. - The management responsibilities have been transferred to two new generation fund managers, He Panpan and Chen Ran, who will oversee all fixed-income and equity products, respectively [5][6]. - This rapid and extensive transfer of management responsibilities to new managers is uncommon in the industry, where a gradual transition is typically preferred to maintain investment strategy stability [5][6]. Group 2: Team Stability Challenges - The recent changes highlight potential gaps in Dachen Fund's investment research team, suggesting that the company may face challenges in maintaining a stable talent pipeline [6][7]. - The departure of key fund managers reflects a broader trend of talent turnover within the company, which has seen several early-stage managers leave since its establishment in 2019 [7][8]. - Industry experts emphasize the importance of building a sustainable research and investment framework to avoid disruptions in performance and investor confidence due to frequent management changes [7][8]. Group 3: Strategic Shift - Since its inception, Dachen Fund aimed to focus on active equity investments but has shifted its strategy towards fixed-income products, with a notable absence of new equity fund launches since mid-2021 [9][10]. - As of September 30, 2025, the total management scale of Dachen Fund's four active equity funds was only 165 million, contrasting sharply with the 921 million managed in five fixed-income products [9][10]. - This strategic pivot may indicate a response to competitive pressures and performance challenges, leading the company to prioritize more stable and scalable fixed-income offerings [9][10].