大批外资逃离中国，西方开始抢夺中国市场，普通人该怎么减小损失

Group 1 - The core argument of the article is that the narrative of foreign capital withdrawing from China is exaggerated and does not reflect the overall market dynamics, as many foreign companies continue to find opportunities in the Chinese market [5][25][29] - There are three categories of foreign companies that have withdrawn from China: manufacturing firms, technology service providers, and those that have relocated their supply chains [7][14][17] - The first category includes manufacturing companies like Samsung and Nikon, which have seen a decline in market share due to the rise of domestic competitors and other operational challenges [9][11] - The second category consists of technology service companies that have reduced their presence in China following revelations about U.S. surveillance programs, leading to a decline in their market viability [14][15] - The third category involves companies like Foxconn that initially moved operations to Southeast Asia to reduce costs but later returned to China due to higher operational challenges and costs in those regions [19][21] Group 2 - The article emphasizes that the withdrawal of some foreign companies is a normal market phenomenon and not indicative of a broader trend, as many foreign firms continue to enter the Chinese market [23][25] - It highlights that China remains an attractive market due to its large population and potential for profitability across various industries [25][27] - The conclusion suggests that while individual companies may face challenges, the overall market in China will continue to evolve, and individuals should adapt to these changes rather than succumb to fear [29]