Core Viewpoint - The statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida regarding Taiwan and the so-called "existential crisis" are seen as a dangerous attempt to revive militarism and historical revisionism, which could threaten both Japan's stability and regional peace [1][4]. Group 1: Japan's Military Intentions - Kishida's remarks linking Taiwan issues to Japan's survival indicate a desire for military intervention, undermining regional stability [1][2]. - The rhetoric suggests Japan is seeking to break free from its "peace constitution" constraints and justify collective self-defense, which could escalate tensions in the region [2][3]. Group 2: Historical Context and Legal Obligations - Japan's post-war commitments, including the renunciation of war and military threats, are being challenged by Kishida's government, which risks violating international agreements that restrict Japan's military actions [2][3]. - The historical context of Japan's militarism, including past invasions under the guise of "self-defense," raises concerns about a potential repeat of such actions [4]. Group 3: Regional Security Implications - Japan's actions could disrupt the established post-war international order and exacerbate security dilemmas in East Asia, leading to increased regional conflict [3][4]. - The potential for Japan to reinterpret its self-defense policies poses a significant risk to regional peace and stability, as it may provoke neighboring countries [3][4].
国际论坛:日方倒行逆施危及地区和平稳定
Ren Min Ri Bao·2025-12-05 00:11