美国前国家安全顾问沙利文称，特朗普败给中国，一点都不冤

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that Trump's approach to China has failed due to its blind, emotional, and strategically deficient nature, as highlighted by former National Security Advisor Sullivan [1] - Trump's imposition of a 145% tariff on Chinese goods is seen as an irrational move that ignored the reality of China's precise countermeasures [3][5] - China's response to U.S. tariffs included export controls on rare earth elements and listing U.S. companies as unreliable, effectively targeting U.S. vulnerabilities [5][11] Group 2 - The U.S. stock market reacted negatively to the initial tariff increase, with the Dow Jones index dropping nearly 1,800 points over three days [5] - The U.S. government had to make concessions, agreeing to reduce tariffs by 115% in a framework agreement, indicating a recognition of the reality of the situation [7] - Sullivan criticized Trump's willingness to relax semiconductor export controls, viewing it as a significant weakening of U.S. technological advantages [7][9] Group 3 - The article emphasizes that the U.S. can no longer rely on outdated tactics of intimidation and negotiation, as China has evolved into a formidable competitor [11][15] - The narrative suggests that China's strategic preparation and ability to counteract U.S. moves have positioned it as a key player in global governance and supply chains [15] - Trump's failure is attributed to a miscalculation of China's resilience and an overreliance on his negotiation style, which is no longer effective against a major power like China [15]