Group 1 - The article discusses the drastic economic decline of Lithuania post-independence, highlighting the consequences of adopting a "shock therapy" approach that dismantled its industrial system, leading to a GDP halving and inflation soaring to 300% [2] - The unemployment rate reached nearly 20%, exacerbating social issues and creating fertile ground for gray industries such as sex work and human trafficking, with the government turning a blind eye in hopes of sustaining itself through "gray taxes" [2] - Recent diplomatic gambles have further deteriorated the situation, as the government prioritizes military expansion over addressing domestic economic issues, resulting in a significant portion of GDP (over 5%) being allocated to military spending [2] Group 2 - The article emphasizes that Lithuania's downfall serves as a cautionary tale about neglecting the importance of public welfare in favor of geopolitical ambitions, leading to predictable decline [3] - It portrays Lithuania as a nation struggling to maintain an illusion of strength while its citizens face dire living conditions, questioning the true value of independence when the dignity and well-being of its people are compromised [3]
从欧洲霸主到“灰色产业天堂”，是怎么一步步“放弃治疗”的？
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-12-05 10:37