特讯！俄罗斯宣告：若欧盟没收俄资产将会得到惊喜，言辞引发全球热议

Core Viewpoint - The European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen proposed using frozen Russian assets to aid Ukraine, which has been interpreted as a significant escalation beyond typical sanctions, directly involving state assets [1][3] Group 1: European Union's Position - The proposed amount for aid to Ukraine has been reduced compared to previous figures, but the fundamental approach of reallocating Russian funds remains unchanged [1] - Belgium is facing significant legal and financial risks as 90% of the frozen assets are held in Brussels, leading to reluctance in supporting the proposal [5] - Hungary and other countries have expressed opposition, highlighting internal divisions within the EU regarding the approach to aid Ukraine while maintaining financial credibility [5] Group 2: Russia's Response - Russia's Foreign Ministry criticized the proposal as "improper," hinting at potential retaliatory measures without specifying them, creating uncertainty about their actions [5][10] - Speculation exists regarding Russia's possible economic retaliation or actions in critical sectors like energy and food, as well as a potential push for global "de-dollarization" and "de-euroization" [10] Group 3: Global Financial Implications - The EU's decision to use frozen Russian assets could undermine the sanctity of property rights and the rule of law, shaking global trust in the Western financial system [6][8] - A decline in confidence in Western currencies like the dollar and euro could lead to increased attractiveness of alternative assets such as the Chinese yuan, UAE dirham, gold, and cryptocurrencies [8] - The ongoing conflict and financial maneuvers may accelerate the diversification of the global financial system, challenging the long-standing dominance of Western financial institutions [8][12] Group 4: Future Uncertainties - The EU faces a dilemma between the urgent need to support Ukraine and the internal discord among member states, which could weaken its unity [8][10] - The potential consequences of reallocating frozen assets could diminish the effectiveness of future sanctions, as countries reassess their asset allocation strategies [10][12] - The ongoing situation represents a critical juncture in international relations, with the potential to leave a lasting impact on the global financial order [12]