贝森特拒任美联储主席！特朗普内阁曝人选博弈，美国经济要变天？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the political maneuvering within the Trump administration regarding the selection of the next Federal Reserve Chair, highlighting the tensions between Treasury Secretary Mnuchin and current Chair Powell, as well as the implications for monetary policy and economic stability [4][13][24]. Group 1: Federal Reserve Criticism - Treasury Secretary Mnuchin expressed a desire to reform the Federal Reserve, criticizing it for being too broad in its responsibilities and losing public trust [6][20]. - Mnuchin's proposal suggests that the Federal Reserve should focus solely on monetary policy, specifically stabilizing inflation and maintaining low unemployment, while relinquishing its regulatory role over banks [8][22]. - He argues that the Federal Reserve's quantitative easing policies have disproportionately benefited large corporations, exacerbating wealth inequality [9][24]. Group 2: Political Dynamics - The article indicates that Mnuchin's criticisms align with Trump's dissatisfaction with Powell, particularly regarding interest rate policies, creating a political backdrop for potential leadership changes at the Federal Reserve [13][15]. - The potential successor to Powell, Kevin Hassett, is noted for his close ties to Trump and advocacy for lower interest rates, which could further align the Federal Reserve with the administration's economic agenda [18][24]. - The article warns that if the Federal Reserve loses its independence and becomes a tool of the Trump administration, it could undermine the credibility of the dollar and U.S. monetary policy [18][26]. Group 3: Economic Implications - The article emphasizes that the ongoing power struggle over the Federal Reserve Chair position is not just about policy differences but also about the broader implications for economic stability and the potential risks to ordinary Americans [22][24]. - It suggests that if the Federal Reserve were to abandon its regulatory functions, it could lead to a repeat of past financial crises, highlighting the importance of maintaining regulatory oversight to prevent economic disasters [22][24]. - The overall message conveys that the independence of the central bank is crucial for economic stability, and any short-term political gains could have long-lasting negative effects on the economy [26].