成都“吸血”西藏的时代，要结束了

Core Viewpoint - The launch of the Yajiang project has generated excitement among residents of Chengdu, but the long-term implications may be negative for Chengdu's economy and real estate market due to the rise of Linzhi as a new economic center [3][11]. Group 1: Economic Implications - The Yajiang project, valued at 1.2 trillion, is seen as a short-term boon for Chengdu's real estate and economy, but it may lead to long-term disadvantages as Linzhi emerges [3][4]. - Chengdu has recently outperformed other cities in the region, such as Chongqing and Wuhan, due to its ability to attract a significant portion of central fiscal transfers from the western region [9][7]. - The influx of central fiscal transfers has allowed Chengdu to invest in infrastructure and attract high-tech industries, but this could change with Linzhi's development [9][19]. Group 2: Linzhi's Rise - The Yajiang project is not just an isolated initiative; it signifies the rise of Linzhi, which may replace Chengdu as the de facto capital for Tibet-related fiscal transfers [11][17]. - Linzhi's favorable ecological environment and lower altitude compared to Chengdu make it a more suitable location for long-term settlement and economic activity for both Han and Tibetan populations [17][19]. - The completion of the Yajiang project and the construction of the Sichuan-Tibet Railway will significantly improve logistics and reduce transportation costs, further enhancing Linzhi's economic viability [18][19]. Group 3: Political and Social Dynamics - The central government may prefer Linzhi as a new hub for Tibetan governance and economic activity, as it aligns better with the goals of national integration and resource allocation [12][18]. - The current arrangement of having Tibetan administrative units in Chengdu is politically unfavorable, as it does not facilitate effective governance or integration [13][12]. - The shift of administrative functions from Chengdu to Linzhi could lead to a more effective governance structure in Tibet, benefiting both local populations and the central government [18][19].