美国用它救36万亿国债，中国却要严打，数字货币面纱下的真相

Group 1 - The core conflict between the U.S. and China regarding cryptocurrency stems from differing financial strategies, with the U.S. viewing it as a means to address its national debt crisis, while China aims to protect its citizens from potential financial losses [1][9] - The emergence of Bitcoin in 2008 coincided with significant changes in global finance, particularly the end of Swiss banking secrecy, which led wealthy individuals to seek new ways to hide their assets, with Bitcoin's anonymity fulfilling this need [3][5] - The 2018 implementation of global anti-money laundering treaties increased scrutiny on financial transactions, driving illicit activities towards cryptocurrencies, which became a preferred method for money laundering due to their decentralized nature [5][9] Group 2 - The U.S. government has actively promoted cryptocurrency as a solution to its $36 trillion national debt, with regulations like the GENIUS Act requiring stablecoins to be backed by U.S. dollars or short-term U.S. Treasury bonds, effectively channeling speculative funds into U.S. debt [5][7] - During Trump's administration, the acceptance of cryptocurrencies was further legitimized, leading to significant investments in U.S. Treasury bonds by stablecoin issuers like Tether, which now holds nearly $120 billion in U.S. debt [7] - China's crackdown on cryptocurrency is driven by two main principles: maintaining the credibility of the RMB without reliance on speculative assets and protecting ordinary citizens from financial losses associated with cryptocurrency investments [9][11] Group 3 - The collapse of major cryptocurrency exchanges like FTX in 2022 highlighted the risks associated with the sector, leading to significant financial losses for millions of investors and reinforcing China's regulatory stance [9][11] - Hong Kong's introduction of a stablecoin regulatory framework aims to facilitate cross-border transactions while minimizing risks, showcasing China's strategic approach to digital currency innovation [11] - The differing approaches to cryptocurrency between the U.S. and China reflect a fundamental divide between prioritizing financial security and short-term speculative gains [11]