Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-12-09 01:30Core Viewpoint - The recent credit crisis involving Xiangyuan Cultural Tourism (600576.SH) and its related companies has raised significant concerns in the capital market, leading to urgent clarifications from the companies to distance themselves from the financial products linked to their actual controller, Yu Faxiang [3][5][9]. Group 1: Company Announcements - On December 7, Xiangyuan Cultural Tourism confirmed that financial products guaranteed by its actual controller Yu Faxiang had experienced overdue payments, but stated that these products were unrelated to the company and that it bore no repayment or guarantee obligations [3][9]. - On the same day, related companies, including Jiaojian Co. (603815.SH) and Haichang Ocean Park (2255.HK), issued similar statements to clarify their positions and mitigate market concerns [5][9]. - The announcements emphasized that the companies' operations remained normal and independent, aiming to isolate the risks associated with the actual controller [9]. Group 2: Market Reaction - Following the crisis rumors, the stock prices of Xiangyuan Cultural Tourism, Jiaojian Co., and Haichang Ocean Park fell significantly, with declines of 14.23%, 16.32%, and 27.54% respectively from December 3 to December 8 [9]. - The market's reaction reflects deep concerns about the potential transmission of risks from the controlling shareholder to the listed companies [5][9]. Group 3: Financial Product Crisis - Reports indicated that overdue financial products linked to Xiangyuan Holdings had not been paid as expected, with investors estimating the total amount of unpaid funds to exceed 10 billion yuan, involving hundreds of products [7][9]. - The overdue products were primarily associated with various financial asset income rights issued by companies under Xiangyuan Holdings, indicating a broader liquidity issue within the group [6][10]. Group 4: Background of Xiangyuan Holdings - Xiangyuan Holdings, controlled by Yu Faxiang, has been involved in complex financial operations, including transferring receivables to affiliated entities to raise funds through public offerings [10][12]. - Despite a recent "AA+" credit rating from Hangzhou United Credit Rating Co., the company faces significant debt pressures and liquidity challenges, particularly in its real estate sector [13][15]. - The company's shift towards the cultural tourism sector has not compensated for the cash flow issues stemming from its real estate operations, which historically provided the bulk of its revenue [22].