3千亿家底被盯梢，俄罗斯双料警告砸向欧盟：敢动就不是钱的事

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the European Union's (EU) freezing of approximately €300 billion of Russian assets, which includes foreign exchange reserves of the Russian central bank and private assets of wealthy individuals [3][5] - The EU is debating the potential use of these frozen funds to support Ukraine's military expenses or compensate for war damages, which Russia perceives as a direct threat to its sovereignty and economic stability [3][8] - Russia has issued strong warnings against the EU's potential actions, indicating that any attempt to seize these assets would be viewed as an act of war, leading to severe repercussions beyond economic sanctions [6][8] Group 2 - The distinction between freezing and confiscating assets is crucial; freezing limits the use of assets while ownership remains with Russia, but confiscation would be a blatant theft of a sovereign nation's property, violating international norms [5][10] - Russia's anger stems from the fact that these assets represent significant national wealth, and their loss would not only be an economic blow but also an affront to Russian sovereignty [8] - The EU faces a dilemma; while it is under pressure to assist Ukraine, major EU countries like Germany and France recognize the risks of escalating tensions with Russia, which could lead to energy supply disruptions and other serious consequences [10] Group 3 - Russia possesses leverage over the EU, including stakes in European companies and energy resources, which could be used for retaliatory measures if conflicts escalate [8][10] - The potential for the EU to set a precedent by confiscating sovereign assets could destabilize the global financial system, prompting countries to relocate their assets to safer jurisdictions [10] - The ongoing conflict over the €300 billion in assets has transcended economic issues, becoming a geopolitical struggle that could lead to broader global chaos if international norms are violated [10]