他们为什么愤怒？

Core Insights - The main argument emphasizes the urgent need for technological equality and the determination for brand elevation within the Chinese automotive industry, as highlighted by the frustrations of industry leaders [8][23]. Group 1: Technological Equality - The automotive market in China shows that vehicles priced above 200,000 yuan account for 30% of the market, while those below 130,000 yuan make up 50%, indicating a gap in high-performance urban driving technology accessibility [2][19]. - Horizon Robotics launched the HSD driver assistance system, aiming to bring urban driving experiences to the mainstream market under 150,000 yuan [2][19]. - The push for technological equality is seen as essential for innovation, with the majority of consumers in the 100,000 to 200,000 yuan range driving the need for industry advancements [23][25]. Group 2: Brand Elevation - Chinese brands have historically been labeled as low-end and cheap, struggling to escape price wars despite technological advancements [25][27]. - The launch of the Zun Jie model, which achieved over 18,000 orders in 175 days at an average price of 900,000 yuan, reflects a shift towards high-quality development and brand elevation [21][25]. - The narrative of luxury in the automotive sector is being redefined by brands like NIO, which focus on user experience rather than traditional markers of luxury such as history and craftsmanship [25][27]. Group 3: Interconnection of Technology and Brand - The relationship between technological equality and brand elevation is complementary; technological advancements provide a solid user base for brands, while elevated brands support ongoing technological development [28][29]. - A healthy ecosystem in the automotive industry should consist of a broad base of technological accessibility supporting a few standout brands, ensuring both market growth and innovation [29].