Group 1 - The U.S. is sending chips to China, which raises questions about prioritizing relations with allies like the UAE, Japan, and South Korea who also need these chips [2][3] - The President's intention to limit AI regulation at the state level due to its national security implications contradicts the decision to send chips to China, creating a logical inconsistency [3][5] - The lack of coherent public policy regarding AI regulation is highlighted, especially given the historical challenges in regulating other technologies like social media [4][5] Group 2 - The executive order on AI does not differentiate between generative AI and other AI applications, which complicates the regulatory landscape for states and cities [7][8] - There are numerous industries regulated at the state level that now incorporate AI, necessitating some form of regulation to protect consumers [8] - The inconsistency in U.S. economic policy is evident, particularly when considering the impact of tariffs and national revenue cuts, which undermine the rationale for certain decisions [10][11]
Nvidia's H200 authorization should go to ally countries not China, says Tusk Venture's Bradley Tusk