欧盟分裂！德国议会压倒性否决没收俄资产提案，冯德莱恩遭重挫

Core Viewpoint - The European Parliament recently voted against proposals to transfer frozen Russian assets to Ukraine and to revoke Russian companies' participation in the Lingen nuclear power plant, reflecting deep-seated concerns among European core countries regarding the implications of such actions [1][3]. Group 1: Political and Geopolitical Factors - Germany's strategic anxiety plays a significant role in opposing the asset transfer proposal, as it recognizes the long-term coexistence with Russia and the potential geopolitical consequences of breaking international asset protection rules [5][7]. - The fear of legal repercussions and the potential for Russia to retaliate against European companies operating in Russia is a major concern for German politicians, who are wary of the long-term costs of such actions [14][18]. Group 2: Financial System Concerns - Belgium's systemic financial threats are a critical barrier, as approximately €190 billion of frozen Russian assets are held in Euroclear, a key financial infrastructure that impacts the stability of the Western financial system [9][10]. - The CEO of Euroclear has warned that utilizing these funds could lead to global legal actions from Russia, potentially crippling the financial institution and affecting the broader financial system [12]. Group 3: Corporate Pressure - Opposition from German multinational corporations, which hold significant investments in Russia, adds pressure against the asset seizure, as they fear reciprocal actions from Russia that could devastate their operations [12][14]. - The potential for a complete exit from the Russian market poses a severe risk to these companies, making the political dispute more complex [14]. Group 4: EU Financial Order - The potential breach of trust in the EU's financial order is a significant concern, as using frozen Russian assets for political purposes could lead to global investors questioning the security of their own assets in Europe [16][19]. - The EU's efforts to maintain its financial system's legitimacy and neutrality are crucial for its status as a global capital haven, and any deviation from this could result in capital flight and systemic instability [19][20].