美国数字货币主权战略提出“清除非法金融黑市”概念

Group 1 - The U.S. Stablecoin Standard Authority (SSA) submitted an administrative request to various financial regulatory bodies, urging the coordination of the newly enacted GENIUS Act and enhanced regulation of offshore dollar stablecoins and their settlement infrastructure [1] - SSA highlighted the macro concept of "CIFB (Clearing Illegal Financial Black Markets)" as a strategic framework for international alignment and domestic enforcement in the digital finance era, comparing its governance significance to post-9/11 international anti-terrorism objectives [1] Group 2 - SSA has focused its risk assessment on the offshore dollar stablecoin USDT, describing it as a "global circulating, dollar-branded 'underground Federal Reserve'" that operates outside effective U.S. regulatory frameworks for anti-money laundering, anti-terrorism financing, and sanctions [2] - The organization warned about the risks associated with "settlement layer anonymity," stating that if the nodes/routers handling dollar stablecoin transactions remain anonymous and under-regulated, it could pose financial integrity risks even if compliance is strengthened at the issuance level [2] - SSA proposed a new compliance approach called "on-chain node KYC," recommending the establishment of a federal-level "Node Registry" to ensure that entities involved in dollar stablecoin validation and settlement are identifiable and compliant [2] Group 3 - Market participants noted that SSA's focus on "settlement layer node identification" indicates a shift in global stablecoin regulation from "who is qualified to issue coins" to "who operates and controls the underlying settlement tracks of stablecoins" [3] - In China, the People's Bank held a meeting on November 28, emphasizing that virtual currency-related activities are illegal financial activities, and defined stablecoins as a form of virtual currency that currently fails to meet customer identity verification and anti-money laundering requirements [3] - The regulatory landscape is tightening for offshore stablecoins like USDT in the U.S., while in China, stablecoins have been categorized under the risk governance framework for virtual currencies, with related activities deemed illegal [3]