股东临时提案不符合规则规定，同济科技董事会决定不予提交股东大会

Group 1 - The board of directors of Tongji Technology (600846) has decided that a temporary proposal submitted by a shareholder does not comply with relevant regulations and should not be submitted for review at the upcoming shareholder meeting on December 19, 2025 [1] - The proposal was submitted by Shanghai Liangding Industrial Development Partnership (Limited Partnership), which holds 13.60% of the shares, and aimed to add a temporary proposal to the agenda of the shareholder meeting [1] - The board provided reasons for rejecting the proposal, emphasizing the need for better communication among shareholders and suggesting that suitable candidates should be proposed for review when the situation is more mature [1] Group 2 - The board conducted a review based on the Company Law, Articles of Association, and other relevant regulations regarding the qualifications of candidates, election procedures, and board structure [2] - The board concluded that the proposal did not meet the necessary qualifications and failed to consider the rights of employee directors and democratic decision-making processes, making it impossible to assess the candidates' qualifications within the given timeframe [2] - The company has been actively promoting the restructuring of the board and has attempted to negotiate with Liangding Partnership regarding the establishment of employee directors, but has not reached an agreement [2] Group 3 - Historical conflicts regarding corporate governance have been evident, with previous proposals being rejected at the 2023 annual shareholder meeting, and attempts by the second-largest shareholder to convene a temporary meeting being canceled [3] - Management has expressed concerns about the impact of shareholder disputes on business confidence and has called for rational responses from all parties to ensure the long-term healthy development of the company [3] - Analysts warn that prolonged control disputes among major shareholders can lead to strategic instability and reduced decision-making efficiency, ultimately harming the interests of all shareholders [3]