中国不跪不退,中方比谁都更清楚,对美国低头的下场是什么
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-12-11 07:01

Group 1 - The trade war initiated by the US against China in March 2018 involved tariffs on steel and aluminum, leading to reciprocal tariffs from China on US goods like soybeans and automobiles [1] - Over time, the trade friction escalated, with the US expanding the scope of tariffs while China responded with countermeasures, maintaining strong export momentum despite increased costs for US companies and rising consumer prices [1] - China's firm stance against US pressure is rooted in historical lessons, recognizing that yielding leads to greater dominance by the US [10][12] Group 2 - The Plaza Accord of 1985 resulted in the appreciation of the Japanese yen, which harmed Japan's export competitiveness and led to economic difficulties, including a stock market and real estate bubble [3] - Japan's eventual compromise did not yield better economic prospects, leading to a prolonged period of stagnation known as the "Lost Decade," where Japan lost significant economic power and job opportunities [4] - The lessons from Japan's experience highlight the risks of yielding to US pressure, as it can lead to a loss of economic autonomy and competitiveness [17] Group 3 - The Alstom case illustrates the use of US jurisdiction to impose penalties on foreign companies, resulting in significant fines and the acquisition of Alstom's power division by General Electric, which diminished France's strategic autonomy [6][8] - The French government's initial attempts to intervene in the acquisition were ultimately ineffective, leading to job losses and a weakened position in the global energy market [8] - This case serves as a cautionary tale for other nations, emphasizing the importance of protecting domestic industries from foreign pressures [13] Group 4 - China's response to the trade war has been characterized by innovation and economic transformation, contrasting with Japan's past compromises [13] - The US's attempts to restrict China's technology sector through export controls have been undermined by China's rapid advancements in artificial intelligence and other fields [15] - Unlike Japan's economic decline post-Plaza Accord, China has maintained economic growth and resilience, positioning itself as a key pillar of global economic stability [15] Group 5 - The historical context of Japan's and France's economic challenges informs China's current strategy, which emphasizes the importance of not yielding to external pressures [19][20] - China's commitment to maintaining its economic sovereignty and resisting US dominance is seen as crucial for sustainable development and global trade order [20] - The ongoing trade tensions highlight the need for countries to learn from past mistakes and adopt a firm stance to protect their economic interests [19]