2 1 Shi Ji Jing Ji Bao Dao·2025-12-12 01:36Core Viewpoint - The Yunnan Provincial Tourism Homestay Industry Association has initiated collective legal action against online travel agencies (OTAs) like Ctrip for alleged abuse of market dominance, including unfair competition practices that harm the rights of homestay operators [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations Against OTAs - The association has received multiple complaints from its members regarding Ctrip and other OTAs using their market power to impose "choose one from two" clauses, unilaterally increasing commissions, setting unfair trading conditions, and blocking traffic [1][2]. - The association's president highlighted that complaints were particularly concentrated against Ctrip during the peak tourist seasons in August and September [2]. Group 2: Legal Actions and Investigations - The association has engaged Shanghai Jintiancheng (Kunming) Law Firm to assist in evidence collection and legal analysis, calling on members to provide relevant documentation [1][3]. - The designated lawyer confirmed that the investigation is not specifically targeting Ctrip but is focused on a broader issue of unfair practices within the industry [3]. Group 3: Regulatory Context - In August, the Guizhou Provincial Market Supervision Administration had already raised concerns with Ctrip and other travel platforms regarding similar issues, including "choose one from two" practices and price manipulation [3]. - In September, the Zhengzhou Market Supervision Administration issued a corrective notice to Ctrip for violating e-commerce laws and engaging in unreasonable restrictions on platform operators [4]. Group 4: Industry Dynamics - The conflict between OTAs and small merchants is not new, with previous allegations against Ctrip dating back to 2021, when a hotel platform accused it of market abuse [4]. - As of the latest update, Ctrip has not responded to the allegations made by the Yunnan Provincial Tourism Homestay Industry Association [5].