立陶宛被欧美彻底抛弃，中国锁死经济命脉，91%出口归零大快人心

Core Viewpoint - The European Union (EU) has quietly terminated its investigation into China's economic coercion against Lithuania, marking the end of a four-year diplomatic conflict without any significant statements or plans for the future [1][3]. Group 1: EU's Decision-Making Process - The EU's decision to end the investigation reflects a calculated retreat, as the official statement indicated insufficient evidence to continue the inquiry while avoiding mention of Lithuania [3]. - Prior to the termination, the EU had already paused trade aid discussions with Lithuania, signaling a shift in priorities towards addressing US-EU tariff disputes [3][5]. - The EU's choice to abandon support for Lithuania is driven by a clear assessment of its economic interests, prioritizing its significant trade relationship with China, which exceeds 800 billion euros annually [5][10]. Group 2: Internal and External Pressures - The decision to terminate the investigation was influenced by external pressures, particularly from the US, which threatened to impose tariffs on EU automobiles, targeting major German manufacturers [7]. - Internally, the EU is divided in its stance towards China, with Lithuania's vocal support only attracting minimal backing from Latvia and Estonia, while major economies like Germany and France prioritize their substantial trade with China [9][12]. - The automotive sector is crucial for the EU, contributing 3.2% to the region's GDP, and any tariffs could severely impact European manufacturing, leading to a reluctance to support Lithuania against China [10][12]. Group 3: Lithuania's Economic Struggles - Lithuania's proactive stance in 2021, allowing Taiwan to open a representative office, led to significant economic repercussions, including a drastic reduction in exports to China, which fell from 230 million euros to 21 million euros, a decline of 91.4% [20][22]. - The closure of trade channels with China resulted in severe consequences for Lithuania's key industries, such as lasers, wood, and dairy, with profits plummeting by 60% in some sectors [22][24]. - Despite Lithuania's appeals for EU support, the assistance remained superficial, and by 2024, Lithuania's fiscal deficit exceeded the EU's warning threshold, indicating a dire economic situation [24][26]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The ongoing trade dynamics illustrate the consequences of political provocations against China, with the EU's retreat highlighting the prioritization of core economic interests over political alliances [26][30]. - The situation serves as a reminder that any challenge to the One China principle will incur costs, and the future of EU-China relations hinges on mutual respect for core interests to avoid similar conflicts [30].