整治“微腐败” 守护“大民生”

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that addressing "micro-corruption" is essential for maintaining public trust and ensuring effective governance [1][2] - The article highlights the establishment of a "five-pronged" collaborative system in Dazhou, which involves party leadership, government oversight, disciplinary action, departmental responsibility, and public evaluation to combat "micro-corruption" [1] - It notes that over 85% of disciplinary cases involve officials at the township and village levels, indicating a significant focus on grassroots corruption [1] Group 2 - The article states that tackling "micro-corruption" is a necessary prerequisite for implementing policies that benefit the public, as it often hinders effective policy execution [2] - It mentions the ongoing efforts to address the most pressing public grievances, such as improving school canteen oversight and ensuring timely subsidies for elderly care facilities [2] - The importance of creating a favorable development environment is underscored, as "micro-corruption" not only harms public interests but also disrupts economic growth [2] Group 3 - The key to combating "micro-corruption" lies in managing "micro-power," with initiatives to clarify responsibilities at the community level and involve citizens in oversight roles [3] - The article advocates for enhancing public participation in monitoring and ensuring transparency to eliminate opportunities for corruption [3] - It emphasizes that the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures and their impact on public welfare should be assessed through community feedback, reinforcing the connection between governance and public satisfaction [3]