泽连斯基愿弃北约换和平？专家泼冷水：这改变不了大局

Core Viewpoint - Ukrainian President Zelensky proposed to abandon Ukraine's NATO membership in negotiations with U.S. envoys regarding a potential peace agreement for the Russia-Ukraine conflict, suggesting security guarantees from the U.S., Europe, and other nations as a compromise instead of NATO membership [2] Group 1: Reactions to Zelensky's Proposal - Analysts from the Cato Institute and the University of Florida expressed skepticism about the practicality of Ukraine joining NATO in the near future, labeling it a "false proposition" [2] - Justin Logan from Cato Institute indicated that there are alternative ways for countries to ensure Ukraine's security, suggesting that U.S. President Trump might continue existing support measures for Ukraine, such as weapon deliveries and sanctions against Russia [2] - Brett Bruen, a former advisor in the Obama administration, characterized Zelensky's concession as "significant and substantive," highlighting the contrast between Ukraine's willingness to make major concessions for peace and Moscow's lack of significant compromises [3] Group 2: Implications of the Proposal - Bruen speculated that Trump might promise to patrol Ukrainian airspace or respond to aircraft incursions, and that the U.S. could increase military aid if Russia launches a large-scale military offensive again [3] - He emphasized that Ukraine needs more than just verbal assurances from Trump; they require concrete actions or elements to ensure that Trump cannot easily backtrack on commitments [3]