稀土战开打！美凑八国组局绕开中国，俄罗斯警告，中国淡定破局

Group 1 - The core point of the article is that the United States has formed a coalition with eight countries to establish a new rare earth supply chain, aiming to reduce dependence on China and enhance geopolitical leverage [1][4][6] - The participating countries include Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Australia, Israel, the UK, the Netherlands, and the UAE, each selected for their unique contributions to the supply chain [1][3] - Australia and the UAE are highlighted for their resource wealth and investment in new energy and minerals, while Japan and South Korea are recognized for their technological capabilities in processing and manufacturing [1][3] Group 2 - The U.S. strategy is characterized by a "binding" approach rather than forming traditional alliances, leveraging the unique strengths of each country while ensuring they remain dependent on U.S. support [1][3] - Japan's position is precarious as it may perceive U.S. support as a safety net, but this comes with the cost of reduced diplomatic autonomy and increased pressure to align with U.S. strategies against China [4][6] - The article emphasizes that while the U.S. aims to create an alternative supply chain, China's dominance in the rare earth market remains unchallenged in the short term, highlighting the complexities of global supply chain dynamics [6][8] Group 3 - China's response to the U.S. coalition is calm, asserting that the restructuring of supply chains through political means is against market principles and poses risks to global stability [6][8] - The article suggests that the ultimate competition in the rare earth supply chain will be a battle of public sentiment and time, with the U.S. coalition's sustainability being questioned [8] - The narrative indicates that Japan's role in the U.S. strategy is significant but comes with high costs, as it may become a pawn in the broader U.S.-China geopolitical contest [6][8]