基金圈清洗！直播打赏一刀切，考核只看赚没赚，再也骗不了普通人

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that new regulations from the Fund Industry Association aim to enhance transparency and accountability in fund sales practices, addressing previous misleading marketing tactics [1][18] - Fund performance must be reported only after a minimum of six months, preventing the manipulation of short-term returns to appear more favorable [1][3] - Fund rankings must be based on at least three years of public data from evaluation agencies, including clear disclosure of the agency's name and the number of similar funds involved in the ranking [3][18] Group 2 - Fund advertisements must avoid using terms like "positive returns" and "largest scale," which can mislead investors [3][18] - Fees associated with fund purchases, including subscription fees and redemption fees, must be clearly itemized, ensuring transparency for investors [5][7] - Funds claiming "zero subscription fees" must also disclose any associated service fees, preventing hidden costs from misleading investors [7][18] Group 3 - Fund live streaming must comply with strict regulations, including requiring sales qualifications for platforms and personnel involved in fund discussions [9][11] - Live streaming content must be pre-approved, and there will be real-time monitoring to ensure compliance during broadcasts [11][13] - The new regulations shift the focus of fund assessments from sales volume to genuine service and long-term investor returns, emphasizing the importance of investor profitability [15][17] Group 4 - The new rules aim to address the issue of funds profiting while investors incur losses, directly linking fund performance to investor outcomes [18][20] - The regulations are designed to protect ordinary investors by reducing misleading practices and enhancing the overall integrity of the fund industry [20]