TRT(SH:600085) Feng Huang Wang Cai Jing·2025-12-16 10:44Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding the Beijing Tongrentang brand, particularly regarding the quality of its health products, specifically a product labeled as "Beijing Tongrentang High Purity Antarctic Krill Oil," which was found to contain zero phospholipids, raising public concerns about product quality and brand integrity [2][5][10]. Group 1: Brand and Product Issues - The low entry barrier for private label products associated with the Beijing Tongrentang brand has led to a proliferation of various products on e-commerce platforms, with minimum order quantities as low as 10,000 boxes [2][10]. - A recent investigation revealed that a product claiming to contain high levels of phospholipids actually had none, indicating potential fraud and leading to scrutiny of the brand's quality control [5][10]. - The company has initiated legal action against its subsidiary, Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., in response to the controversy, aiming to protect its brand image [4][10]. Group 2: Manufacturer and Regulatory Concerns - The manufacturer of the disputed krill oil product, Anhui Habao Pharmaceutical Co., has a history of administrative penalties and food safety issues, including multiple instances of non-compliance with food safety standards [7][9]. - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee has demanded explanations from both the manufacturer and the distributor regarding the product's actual content and quality [5][10]. - The article highlights the ongoing cycle of quality issues, penalties, and public relations efforts that have plagued the brand, questioning the effectiveness of legal actions in restoring consumer trust [26][28]. Group 3: Brand Authorization and Market Practices - The private label business model employed by subsidiaries of Beijing Tongrentang involves brand authorization and contract manufacturing, allowing for a wide range of products to be marketed under the brand name [10][12]. - The article notes that while the brand name is prominently displayed, the actual trademark used is different from the well-known Tongrentang logo, which may confuse consumers [10][20]. - The company has previously emphasized that unauthorized use of its brand name is illegal and has taken steps to clarify its position on brand management and quality assurance [27][28].