《蜀道奇》手卷撤拍 拍卖业审查症结待解

Core Viewpoint - The auction of Guo Moruo's calligraphy scroll "Shu Dao Qi" has been suspended due to ownership disputes, highlighting issues in the auction industry regarding procedural compliance versus substantive review [1][2][3] Group 1: Auction Dispute Details - The auction for Guo Moruo's "Shu Dao Qi" was scheduled for December 16 but has been removed from the Poly Auction website due to ownership disputes [1][2] - Poly Auction has stated that the consignor claimed to hold the artwork legally and provided transfer records and purchase agreements, asserting compliance with auction laws [2][3] - The dispute arose after a lawyer's statement on December 10 claimed that Guo Moruo's daughter, Guo Shuying, is the rightful owner and has never authorized any third-party transactions regarding the artwork [3] Group 2: Legal and Industry Implications - The core responsibility in the dispute lies with the consignor, who must prove legal ownership and disclose accurate ownership information to the auction house [4] - Poly Auction's review process is primarily formal, focusing on the completeness of documents rather than the authenticity of ownership claims, which raises questions about their liability in the event of disputes [6] - The auction industry faces challenges with ownership disputes and authenticity issues, necessitating a shift from procedural compliance to substantive trustworthiness [7][8] Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Legal clarity regarding auction companies' responsibilities is essential, with future judicial practices potentially redefining the "reasonable due diligence" obligations of auction houses [8] - Technological solutions, such as blockchain, could enhance transparency in ownership records, allowing for quick verification of artwork provenance [8] - The industry must collaborate to improve risk management, establish clearer standards, and enhance legal responsibilities to transition from mere procedural compliance to substantive credibility [8]