法治的彰显 正义的胜利

Group 1 - The Hong Kong High Court convicted Jimmy Lai of colluding with foreign forces and inciting publications that threaten national security, reflecting a zero-tolerance stance towards such activities [1][2] - The trial lasted 156 days, examining 2,220 pieces of evidence and over 80,000 pages of documents, with a judgment rationale of 855 pages made publicly available [2] - The conviction is seen as a reaffirmation of the rule of law in Hong Kong, emphasizing that legal principles will be upheld and violations will be punished [2][3] Group 2 - The case serves as a warning against actions that undermine national security, with various political groups asserting that the ruling reinforces the importance of maintaining social stability [3][4] - The conviction is viewed as a significant step in implementing the Hong Kong National Security Law, showcasing the judicial system's capability to handle national security cases effectively [5][6] - Public sentiment reflects a consensus that maintaining national security is essential for the well-being of Hong Kong's 7.5 million residents, ensuring the stability of the "one country, two systems" principle [6]