特朗普心心念念的东西，中方转头给了别国，美国专家直呼拿中国没辙了

Group 1 - The article discusses the renewed trade policies under Trump's second term, focusing on aggressive tariffs and sanctions aimed at China, particularly in sectors like semiconductors and high-end manufacturing [1][11] - Trump's administration aims to leverage tariffs as a negotiation tool to gain an upper hand in trade discussions, believing that economic pressure will force China to concede on issues like intellectual property and market access [1][11] - The response from China has been measured, with a focus on diversifying its export markets and strengthening regional partnerships, indicating a shift in its economic strategy away from reliance on the U.S. [1][11] Group 2 - The article highlights the impact of tariffs on U.S. consumers, noting that prices for various goods have increased by 10% to 20%, contributing to inflation concerns [1][11] - Despite the imposition of tariffs, China's export performance remains strong, with significant growth in exports to ASEAN, the EU, and the Middle East, suggesting a reduced dependency on the U.S. market [1][11] - The article points out that the U.S. trade deficit with China has decreased, but the overall trade deficit has widened, indicating structural issues within the U.S. economy [1][11] Group 3 - The article emphasizes the long-term strategic differences between the U.S. and China, with the U.S. focusing on short-term gains through tariffs while China invests in technology and infrastructure for future growth [1][11] - It notes that the U.S. is losing its position as the sole rule-maker in global trade, as other countries are increasingly seeking multilateral cooperation over unilateral actions [1][11] - The narrative suggests that the ongoing trade tensions are not just about tariffs but reflect deeper ideological differences regarding economic governance and global trade practices [1][11]