反击正式开启，俄罗斯向欧洲索赔18.2万亿，对待强盗只能以牙还牙

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that Russia is officially retaliating against Europe for the freezing of its sovereign assets, with President Putin indicating that any actions taken by Europe will be met with equivalent responses from Russia [1][3][9] - The Russian Central Bank has filed a lawsuit against the European Clearing Bank in Moscow arbitration court, claiming compensation of 18.2 trillion rubles, approximately equivalent to $230 billion, which matches the amount of frozen Russian sovereign assets in Europe [3][11][12] - The European Union's decision to indefinitely freeze Russian assets, initially requiring unanimous consent every six months, has escalated tensions, with the total frozen assets valued at around €210 billion, primarily held in the European Clearing Bank [5][7] Group 2 - The EU is considering using the frozen Russian assets as collateral to raise funds for Ukraine, estimated between €90 billion and €140 billion, which Russia has condemned as "international theft" [9][28] - Russia's lawsuit is a calculated response to the EU's actions, as it includes both the principal amount of frozen assets and accrued interest, indicating a strategic approach to counter the EU's financial maneuvers [11][12] - The Russian government has prepared for potential outcomes of the lawsuit, including the possibility of seizing European assets within Russia if the EU proceeds with its plans [15][20] Group 3 - The internal dissent within the EU regarding the use of frozen Russian assets is notable, with leaders from Belgium, Hungary, and Slovakia expressing concerns that such actions could undermine the rule of law and threaten their own national reserves [22] - The EU's actions have raised alarms globally, as they set a precedent that could jeopardize the security of sovereign assets held by other nations, prompting countries like Brazil and India to reduce their euro-denominated assets [24][26] - The dispute between Russia and the EU is not only a bilateral issue but also poses risks to the global financial order, as it challenges established norms regarding the protection of sovereign assets and could lead to broader repercussions for international trust in the European financial system [26][28]