WBD Calls Out “Pressure Tactic” – How Paramount's Hardball Legal Letter Backfired On Eve Of Final Bids

Core Viewpoint - The media giant Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) is defending its decision to select Netflix over Paramount in a recent auction, amidst a hostile takeover attempt from Paramount valued at $108 billion, while Netflix's offer was $82.7 billion [1][4]. Group 1: Auction Process and Decisions - WBD's board urged shareholders to reject Paramount's hostile bid, providing context for choosing Netflix's offer, which they deemed superior [4][15]. - Paramount's bid included an all-cash offer of $30 per share, which WBD disputes as not superior to Netflix's offer [12][16]. - The auction process involved multiple bids from Paramount, with WBD asserting that Paramount's proposals were not adequately addressed during discussions [17][20]. Group 2: Legal and Communication Issues - A letter from Paramount's lawyers accused WBD of management conflicts and bias, which WBD countered by stating that the letter was a pressure tactic [3][5]. - WBD highlighted that the legal letter from Paramount's attorneys contained no actionable proposals and relied on inaccurate media reports [10][11]. - Communication between WBD and Paramount was characterized by a lack of constructive engagement, with WBD noting that Paramount's legal advisors acknowledged the December 3 letter was a mistake [6][7]. Group 3: Executive Compensation and Implications - WBD's CEO David Zaslav stands to gain significantly from the merger, with potential payouts exceeding $500 million if Paramount's offer succeeds [22][23]. - The compensation package for Zaslav includes a cash severance of $30 million, equity worth nearly $538 million, and additional benefits [23]. - The ongoing negotiations and potential merger agreements are expected to include details on executive payouts, which could impact shareholder perceptions [24].