同一基金经理操盘：两基金“拖后腿”超19％ 一基金却大赚24％！

Core Viewpoint - The performance differentiation of fund managers, particularly Li You from Chuangjin Hexin Fund, has become a focal point in the context of ongoing salary reforms in the fund industry, highlighting the impact of performance on compensation assessments [1][5]. Performance Disparity - The significant performance differences among the funds managed by Li You stem from contrasting portfolio structures, with Chuangjin Hexin Industry Select A underperforming its benchmark by 26.86% and 19.49% for Chuangjin Hexin Industrial Cycle Select A, while Chuangjin Hexin Resource Theme A achieved a 24.75% excess return [1][2]. - The underperformance of Chuangjin Hexin Industry Select A is attributed to its heavy concentration in manufacturing sectors like new energy and semiconductors, which faced valuation adjustments and increased competition from 2022 to 2024 [2]. - The lithium price decline in 2023 pressured the profitability of midstream material companies, and despite gradual reductions in holdings, the adjustment lagged behind market turning points, leading to sustained net value losses [2]. Investor Confidence and Fund Stability - The performance pressure has directly affected the stability of fund sizes, as seen with Chuangjin Hexin Industry Select A, which experienced net outflows despite a significant rebound in net value in Q3 2025 [3]. - The high volatility and valuation elasticity of high-growth sectors demand precise judgment and trading timing from fund managers, with concentrated holdings amplifying potential losses during market downturns [3]. Recent Performance Improvements - Recent data indicates improvements in excess returns for Chuangjin Hexin Industry Select A and Chuangjin Hexin Industrial Cycle, with respective one-year excess returns of 19.02% and 3.35% as of December 15, 2025 [3][5]. Salary Reform and Performance Assessment - The ongoing salary reform in the fund industry emphasizes a longer assessment period of over three years and a comprehensive view of all products managed by fund managers, which may lead to stricter evaluations for those with significant performance disparities [5][6]. - This reform is expected to encourage fund managers to distribute their research efforts more evenly across all products, rather than focusing solely on high-profile funds [5]. Implications for Fund Managers - Fund managers are required to reassess their investment capabilities within a more integrated and long-term evaluation framework, potentially leading to a focus on areas where they can consistently generate alpha [6]. - The core objective of the salary reform is to align individual capabilities, product positioning, and investor interests more accurately through optimized incentive mechanisms [6].