日本国内及国际社会持续批评高市早苗错误言行
Ren Min Ri Bao·2025-12-18 03:51

Core Viewpoint - The statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanna Takashi regarding Taiwan represent a dangerous shift in Japan's historical perspective and have drawn widespread criticism both domestically and internationally [1][2][3]. Group 1: Domestic Reactions - Various Japanese intellectuals have criticized Takashi's remarks as a significant deviation from the established stance of previous Japanese governments on Taiwan, urging her to retract her statements to prevent further deterioration of Sino-Japanese relations [2]. - The chairman of the "Inheriting and Developing the Murayama Statement" group, Fujita Takakage, condemned Takashi's comments as a violation of the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement, labeling them as unforgivable [2]. - Retired high school history teacher Takado Shinichi emphasized the need for Japan to acknowledge its historical aggressions and apologize to the Chinese people for the atrocities committed during the invasion [2]. Group 2: International Perspectives - Scholars from various countries have expressed concern over Takashi's remarks, viewing them as a blatant interference in China's internal affairs and a potential revival of militarism in Japan [4][5]. - Jeffrey Sachs, an American economist, called for a cautious and peaceful approach in Japan's policy towards China, warning that a resurgence of militarism could lead to an arms race detrimental to Japan's interests [4]. - Experts from Lebanon and Austria highlighted that Japan's recent actions contradict its post-World War II constitution, which renounces war, and could exacerbate regional tensions [5][7]. Group 3: Historical Context - The historical context of Japan's wartime actions, including the deaths of over 35 million Chinese civilians and soldiers during the invasion, was reiterated as a critical factor that Japan must confront to avoid repeating past mistakes [7]. - The need for Japan to recognize its historical responsibilities and the consequences of its militaristic past was emphasized as essential for maintaining peace and stability in the region [6][7].