Hua Er Jie Jian Wen·2025-12-18 08:07Core Viewpoint - China Pacific Insurance (CPIC) reported a premium income of 438 billion yuan for the first 11 months, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 5.32% [1] Group 1: Premium Performance - The premium income from life insurance and property insurance subsidiaries was 250.32 billion yuan and 187.68 billion yuan, with year-on-year growth rates of 9.4% and 0.3% respectively [1] - The growth rate of CPIC's life insurance has shown stability, aligning closely with the industry average, while property insurance has lagged behind by 3.6 percentage points [1] - Compared to other leading companies in the industry, such as ZhongAn Online, which achieved a premium growth rate of 5.18% in the first ten months, CPIC's property insurance growth appears significantly lower [1] Group 2: Business Structure and Strategy - CPIC's life insurance has successfully navigated the transformation of its agent model, maintaining a stable workforce of 181,000 insurance agents, with a year-on-year increase in average first-year premium per agent of 16.6% to 71,000 yuan [3] - In the first three quarters, CPIC's premium and new business value grew by 14.2% and 31.2% respectively, with improvements in customer demographics and product structure [3] - The company has strategically reduced exposure in high-risk personal credit guarantee insurance, resulting in a 129.9% decline in related premiums [4] Group 3: Market Trends and Future Outlook - The premium growth rate for CPIC's life insurance saw a noticeable decline in November compared to October, likely due to preparations for the "New Year" sales period starting in October [4] - The overall pressure on property insurance premiums is attributed to adjustments in non-auto insurance business, with auto insurance and non-auto insurance showing year-on-year growth rates of 2.9% and -2.6% respectively [4] - The chairman of CPIC's property insurance division indicated that the overall combined cost ratio for non-auto insurance was 97.6%, which could improve to 94.8% by excluding the impact of personal credit guarantee insurance [4]