明码标价拿国奖，让“公平”二字往哪搁？

Core Viewpoint - The investigation reveals that national-level university competitions, intended to be fair platforms for talent selection, have been compromised by intermediaries selling awards online, creating a gray profit chain that undermines educational integrity [1][2]. Group 1: Issues Identified - Some intermediaries and students are selling competition awards through "nominal" and "overall project sale" methods, with prices ranging from thousands to tens of thousands of yuan [1]. - The commercialization of awards has led to a complete gray profit chain, which poses a significant threat to educational fairness and academic integrity [1]. - The drive behind these issues includes the competitive nature of graduate school admissions and awards, where national-level awards are seen as valuable "hard currency" [1]. Group 2: Proposed Solutions - Cutting off online transaction channels is essential to curb the spread of these issues, requiring platforms to establish regular inspection and rapid response mechanisms [2]. - Upgrading the competition evaluation mechanism is crucial, advocating for a composite evaluation system that includes multiple rounds of blind review, on-site defense, and long-term public disclosure [2]. - Universities must enforce strict audits and penalties for students involved in award trading, holding both students and faculty accountable [2]. Group 3: Conclusion - To restore the integrity of competitions, it is imperative to decisively sever the underlying gray profit chain, ensuring that every effort is treated fairly and justly [3].