两个方法，彻底摆脱“越亏越扛”的赌徒心理

Group 1 - The article discusses the "gambler's fallacy," where individuals believe that past independent events influence future outcomes, leading to irrational betting behavior [1][2][8] - It explains the difference between "independent event probability" and "mean reversion," emphasizing that while individual events are independent, over a large number of trials, probabilities will converge to expected values [2][3] - The concept of "infinite" is introduced, indicating that past outcomes have negligible impact on future results, reinforcing the idea that gamblers often misinterpret random sequences as patterns [3][4][6] Group 2 - The article highlights the psychological phenomenon known as the "Zeigarnik effect," which explains why individuals struggle to abandon ongoing tasks or investments, as they feel a psychological tension until the task is completed [19][22] - It suggests that the perception of time influences decision-making, where continuous events are misinterpreted as connected, leading to flawed reasoning in gambling and investing [11][15] - The article provides two recommendations to mitigate the gambler's mindset: resetting time to create a psychological break and pre-setting stop-loss mechanisms to manage risk effectively [27][29]