特朗普大手一挥，将天下三分：中国执掌亚洲，美国主导西半球？

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the United States is adjusting its international positioning, focusing on consolidating its influence in the Western Hemisphere while allowing China to play a larger role in Asia, with Europe being intentionally marginalized [1][3][14] - The U.S. aims to solidify its control over the Western Hemisphere, emphasizing a shift from a rhetoric of partnership to a more unilateral approach driven by self-interest [3][5] - The strategic shift is driven by the need for scarce resources essential for industries such as electric vehicles, high-end chip manufacturing, and modern military, with Latin America possessing rich deposits of these strategic resources [5][15] Group 2 - The U.S. is expected to adopt a more direct and efficient intervention strategy in the Western Hemisphere, moving away from dialogue and cooperation towards command-style execution [7][12] - Economic tools such as tariffs, targeted sanctions, and capital flow restrictions are increasingly used to exert pressure on countries that deviate from U.S. interests [9][11] - The U.S. has redefined stability in the region to mean conditions that serve its own interests, rather than genuine social or economic progress in Central American countries [11][12] Group 3 - In Asia, the U.S. is not relinquishing its influence but is instead changing its approach to maintain a low-cost, long-term strategy of containment against China [16][19] - The U.S. continues to impose technology export controls in critical areas like semiconductor manufacturing and artificial intelligence, aiming to block access to high-end technology breakthroughs while allowing participation in lower-end segments [18][20] - The U.S. military presence in Asia is becoming more indirect, with allies being pressured to increase defense spending and align their industries with U.S. interests [20][21] Group 4 - In Europe, the U.S. is leveraging the ongoing conflict in Ukraine to enhance its military and economic influence, while European countries face rising energy costs and declining industrial competitiveness [22][25] - The U.S. benefits from a divided and anxious Europe, which struggles to achieve unified decision-making, thereby ensuring continued capital inflow into U.S. markets [23][25] - NATO has evolved into a system of deep dependency, with European countries losing economic and security independence, reflecting a one-way relationship favoring U.S. interests [25][27]