过剩也可以被“计划”吗？

Group 1 - The core debate revolves around the sustainability of the "China model," characterized by an administrative-led market economy, which some describe as a modern version of state capitalism or "national economy" [1][3] - The Chinese economy faces issues of production surplus, which is typically associated with capitalism, raising questions about the balance between investment scale and efficiency, as well as distribution [3][5] - Economic growth in China is primarily driven by investment, but this does not necessarily translate to increased returns, leading to a disconnect between production and consumption [3][5] Group 2 - There is a significant imbalance in fiscal spending, with high administrative costs limiting the effectiveness of social welfare spending, which in turn affects effective demand [5] - The low proportion of social security spending in GDP contributes to stagnant consumer price indices, negatively impacting consumption and leading to a cycle of low prices and production inefficiencies [5] - The lack of a balanced distribution among government, enterprises, and households has resulted in deflationary pressures, indicating that the economic surplus may be a result of planned inefficiencies [5]