希拉里蓬佩奥齐声反对：特朗普全球势力划分背后的霸权自私本质

Group 1 - The recent speech at Columbia University highlighted a rare moment of unity between Hillary Clinton and Mike Pompeo, both criticizing Trump's global strategy, indicating a shift in U.S. foreign policy dynamics [1] - Clinton revealed that the Pentagon is discussing the division of spheres of influence, suggesting a strategy where the U.S. maintains control over the Western Hemisphere while Russia and China manage Eastern Europe and East Asia respectively [1] - The U.S. military presence in the Caribbean and East Pacific has reached its highest level in decades, with operations under the guise of anti-drug missions actually aimed at resource acquisition in Venezuela, Bolivia, and Brazil [1] Group 2 - Brazil's experience serves as a warning for Latin American countries, as the U.S. has imposed severe tariffs and sanctions when Brazil sought to balance trade between the U.S. and China [3] - Trump's administration has linked immigration issues to the legitimacy of regimes, pressuring countries to prioritize resource delivery to the U.S. over sovereignty concerns [3] - The U.S. strategy in the Asia-Pacific aims to exhaust China economically while preventing its industrial upgrade, with increasing restrictions on technology and military alliances with regional allies [3] Group 3 - Europe's situation is precarious, with rising natural gas costs due to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, while the U.S. profits by selling gas to Europe at inflated prices [5] - The U.S. has successfully exploited fears of Russia among Eastern European nations to create divisions within the EU, undermining efforts for strategic autonomy [5] - The traditional hegemonic perspective represented by Clinton and Pompeo reflects a reluctance to accept the decline of U.S. manufacturing and global dominance, as evidenced by reliance on imports for essential goods [5] Group 4 - China is actively pursuing regional economic partnerships like RCEP and engaging in mutually beneficial energy cooperation in Latin America, contrasting with the U.S. approach of viewing the world as a chessboard [7] - The U.S. strategy of treating regions as personal assets and engaging in self-serving tactics is increasingly seen as outdated, as countries seek independent development paths [8] - The notion of strategic contraction by the U.S. is viewed as a sign of declining hegemony, with the global trend moving towards multipolarity and nations pursuing their own development goals [8]