汇源集团声明将恢复北京汇源控制权，朱新礼或重掌品牌

Core Viewpoint - The recent statement from Huiyuan Group indicates a potential shift in control over Beijing Huiyuan, with the founder Zhu Xinli possibly regaining management rights after a tumultuous restructuring process [1][4][5]. Group 1: Company Control and Management - Beijing Huiyuan, a core asset of Huiyuan Juice, has been under restructuring since being ruled for reorganization three years ago, with Wen Sheng Assets investing 1.6 billion yuan [2][7]. - Huiyuan Group has announced plans to legally restore management rights over Beijing Huiyuan, claiming that Wen Sheng Assets has violated agreements during the restructuring process [4][5]. - The current management decisions of Beijing Huiyuan will be deemed invalid without Huiyuan Group's approval, which could lead to Zhu Xinli regaining full control over the brand and operations [5][6]. Group 2: Conflicts and Legal Issues - Since the second half of 2025, conflicts between Beijing Huiyuan and Wen Sheng Assets have escalated, including allegations of unauthorized use of company seals and attempts to mislead stakeholders [8][10]. - Beijing Huiyuan has publicly expressed dissatisfaction with Wen Sheng Assets, citing incomplete capital contributions and operational disruptions caused by their actions [12][14]. - The ongoing disputes have raised concerns about the potential dilution of shareholder rights and the financial stability of Beijing Huiyuan, as the company struggles to meet performance commitments [11][20]. Group 3: Financial Performance and Market Position - Beijing Huiyuan's financial performance has been declining, with reported revenues of 2.745 billion yuan and 2.475 billion yuan for 2023 and 2024, respectively, alongside net profits of 393 million yuan and 330 million yuan [22]. - The company faces significant challenges in adapting to market changes, as the juice industry shifts towards healthier product offerings, impacting its market share [22][23]. - The restructuring process has been marred by internal conflicts, raising questions about the company's ability to emerge successfully from its current difficulties [23].