“两高”联合发布第三批行政公益诉讼典型案例

Core Viewpoint - The release of the third batch of typical administrative public interest litigation cases by the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate aims to enhance the guidance and leading role of typical cases in promoting the rule of law and protecting public interests in various sectors [1][2]. Group 1: Administrative Public Interest Litigation Cases - The seven typical cases cover multiple fields and reflect the importance of administrative public interest litigation in serving national interests and protecting the well-being of the people [1][2]. - The cases emphasize a problem-oriented approach, addressing issues where public interests are neglected due to the absence of direct stakeholders, thus highlighting the necessity of litigation to resolve governance deadlocks [1][2]. Group 2: Case Summaries - The case from Haikou City involves a company illegally occupying agricultural land and causing environmental damage, leading to a public interest lawsuit initiated by the local procuratorate after ineffective administrative responses [4][5][6]. - In Guizhou Province, a case was filed against the local agricultural bureau for failing to regulate pesticide use, which resulted in significant harm to local beekeepers and agricultural safety [10][11][12]. - A case in Chongqing highlighted the failure of the market supervision bureau to manage prescription drug sales, leading to public health risks due to improper sales practices by pharmacies [15][16][17]. - The case from Heilongjiang Province focused on the local housing authority's neglect in managing public rental housing, resulting in significant public asset losses and ineffective use of resources [20][21][22]. - In Henan Province, a case was initiated against the urban management bureau for failing to address safety hazards posed by improperly installed street fixtures, impacting the mobility of disabled individuals [25][26][27]. - The case in Anhui Province involved the local human resources bureau's inaction against gender discrimination in job postings, infringing on women's employment rights [30][31][32]. - A case in Shaanxi Province addressed the cultural heritage protection responsibilities of the local tourism bureau, which failed to act on the deteriorating condition of a significant historical site [35][36][37]. Group 3: Implications and Significance - The typical cases demonstrate the collaborative efforts of various departments under the unified leadership of the Party, showcasing a comprehensive public interest protection framework [2]. - The cases serve as a model for enhancing legal standards and promoting the stability and development of China's administrative public interest litigation system [2]. - The outcomes of these cases reinforce the importance of judicial oversight in ensuring that administrative bodies fulfill their legal responsibilities, thereby protecting public interests and promoting social governance [19][24][29].