Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the EU's proposal to use approximately €210 billion of frozen Russian central bank assets as collateral to provide financing to Ukraine, aiming to alleviate budget pressures while maintaining support for Ukraine [2][3] - EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen emphasized the necessity of this plan for Ukraine's survival and European security, expressing concerns about potential Russian countermeasures that could destabilize European financial stability [2][3] - Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán stated that Hungary and several member states oppose the plan, stressing the importance of EU neutrality and the need for close communication among member states [3][4] Group 2 - There is a growing divergence between the US and the EU regarding the use of frozen Russian assets, with the US favoring the use of these assets for its own reconstruction efforts in Ukraine, while the EU aims to keep the benefits internal [3][4] - The EU's strategy appears to be focused on binding member states' positions, avoiding legal risks, and transferring the burden of aid through the "using Russian assets for Ukraine" plan, which has faced legal and moral controversies [4][5] - The internal divisions within the EU are hindering the progress of the financing plan, as some member states have clearly opposed the initiative, highlighting the challenges of finding alternative aid routes without relying on Russian assets [5]
欧盟吞不下俄资产,转头薅乌克兰羊毛
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-12-23 06:54