Group 1 - The article discusses the increasing political pressure on the Federal Reserve, particularly from President Trump, who has stated that only those who agree with him will be appointed as Fed Chair [1][5] - Historical parallels are drawn between Trump's actions and past instances of presidential interference with the Fed, notably during the Nixon and Carter administrations, highlighting the recurring theme of political influence on monetary policy [3][7] - The independence of the Federal Reserve is under unprecedented challenge, with suggestions that the Trump administration may seek to amend the Federal Reserve Act to grant the president greater control over appointments [5][8] Group 2 - Concerns from Wall Street are significant, with a Morgan Stanley report indicating that if the Fed becomes a political tool, the premium of the dollar as a reserve currency could evaporate by 30% [7] - The article emphasizes the conflict between the election cycle, which the president is focused on, and the long-term economic stability that the Fed aims to protect, raising questions about how long this balance can be maintained [7][8] - The historical context provided suggests that Fed chairs who have yielded to political pressure often end up with a negative legacy in economic history, underscoring the importance of maintaining central bank independence [8]
突发特讯!特朗普通告全球:不同意我观点的人不会成为美联储主席,罕见措辞引爆国际舆论
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-12-24 08:42