IPO雷达｜耀泰股份97%收入漂洋过海，监管聚焦其昔日“刷单”行为

Core Viewpoint - Ningbo Yaotai Optoelectronic Technology Co., Ltd. (Yaotai) is under regulatory scrutiny due to concerns regarding its shareholding structure, overseas revenue stability, and past practices of "brushing" orders on e-commerce platforms [1][12]. Group 1: Company Overview - Yaotai is a high-tech enterprise focused on the research, design, production, and sales of outdoor courtyard lighting products, integrating IoT technology into its offerings [2]. - The company has developed four core product series: scene lighting, smart lighting, solar lighting, and work lighting [2]. Group 2: Shareholding and Financial Transactions - The actual controllers of the company, Fang Yi and Zhang Liqing, hold a combined 78.10% of the shares [2]. - There have been historical instances of shareholding proxies, with discrepancies between registered and actual shareholding structures noted until December 2017 [4]. - Yaotai has engaged in financial transactions with related parties, including loans from shareholder Zhu Yuehua, which have raised concerns about compliance and potential conflicts of interest [5]. Group 3: Financial Performance - The company's revenue for the years 2022 to 2024 was reported as 487 million yuan, 489 million yuan, and 552 million yuan, respectively, with net profits of approximately 37.8 million yuan, 64.9 million yuan, and 85.2 million yuan [7]. - The overseas revenue accounted for 97% of the total revenue in 2024, with significant contributions from North American and European clients [8]. Group 4: Regulatory Concerns - The regulatory body has raised questions about the stability of relationships with major overseas clients, particularly regarding the rapid growth of sales to Costco [9]. - Yaotai has acknowledged the existence of "brushing" activities on the Tmall platform, which involved manipulating sales figures, but claims these actions were limited and did not extend to other platforms [12]. - The company has also been scrutinized for registering Amazon stores under third-party names, which it claims was a strategy to enhance product exposure [13].