突发特讯!马克龙拒不接受中国反制,紧急要求欧盟27国一致对华,引发全球高度关注
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-12-25 07:10

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around China's imposition of temporary anti-subsidy duties on EU dairy products, ranging from 21.9% to 42.7%, which has prompted a strong response from France and calls for a unified EU stance against China [1][3] - This action is part of an ongoing trade friction between China and the EU, mirroring the EU's previous anti-subsidy measures on Chinese electric vehicles, which were implemented to protect local industries [3][5] - The affected EU dairy products include high-value items such as cream and cheese, with varying tax rates based on cooperation levels from different companies, indicating a strategic approach to encourage compliance [5][10] Group 2 - France's rapid and strong reaction is attributed to its significant agricultural sector, which is heavily impacted by trade policies, as seen in previous investigations and tariffs on French brandy and pork [7][8] - The French government is under pressure to maintain agricultural stability and political cohesion, with President Macron advocating for a stronger EU response to trade imbalances with China [10][11] - The EU's internal divisions regarding trade dependencies and vulnerabilities complicate the formation of a unified front against China, as member states have differing interests and levels of reliance on Chinese markets [11][18] Group 3 - The ongoing trade conflict highlights the importance of technical negotiations and the potential for limited decoupling rather than a complete severance of trade ties, as both sides seek to manage their respective industries and political costs [13][16] - There is a possibility for both parties to reach a structured resolution through mechanisms like price commitments or differentiated tax rates, which could mitigate the intensity of the conflict [13][18] - The outcome of this trade dispute will depend on the ability of both sides to navigate their vulnerabilities and find common ground, with the potential for a more manageable divergence rather than outright confrontation [18][20]