美对台军售闯下大祸,中方怒抛118亿美债!解放军40架次军机围台
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-12-24 06:36

Group 1 - The U.S. recently approved a record $11.1 billion arms sale to Taiwan, including offensive weapons such as M109A7 self-propelled howitzers and HIMARS long-range strike systems, aimed at enhancing Taiwan's military capabilities and complicating China's efforts for reunification [1] - The arms sale is seen as a political tool by U.S. politicians, particularly as the midterm elections approach, with Trump leveraging it to appeal to conservative factions and the military-industrial complex while diverting attention from domestic issues [1] - Taiwan's defense budget is expected to exceed 3% of its GDP due to the costly arms acquisition, leading to a potential cycle of debt and economic strain, as funds are diverted from social welfare to military spending [9] Group 2 - China has significantly reduced its holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds to $688.7 billion, the lowest since 2008, signaling a strategic decision to lower risk and reduce dependence on dollar assets amid rising U.S. debt and fiscal instability [3] - The Chinese military has demonstrated its capabilities with increased activity around Taiwan, including the deployment of aircraft and naval vessels, indicating a strong military response to perceived provocations [5] - The disparity in military capabilities between China and Taiwan is stark, with Taiwan's military relying heavily on imports and facing challenges in self-production, while China's military strength continues to grow, complicating the security landscape in the region [7] Group 3 - The U.S. strategy of arming Taiwan and rallying allies like Japan and Australia is becoming less effective as American hegemony declines, with concerns over the credibility of the dollar increasing due to China's actions [9] - The arms sale is unlikely to resolve the U.S. economic challenges or support Taiwan's independence aspirations, as the military assets acquired may not enhance security but rather hinder Taiwan's economic development [9] - Historically, the process of national reunification is viewed as irreversible, with external interventions and internal resistance unable to alter the eventual outcome of Taiwan's return to China [10]