用搭载GPT-5.2的眼镜做题，是一种什么体验？

Core Insights - The experiment conducted by Hong Kong University of Science and Technology demonstrated that the Rokid smart glasses equipped with OpenAI's GPT-5.2 model scored 92.5 out of 100 in a final exam, which is lower than the highest student score of 97.5 but significantly higher than the class average of 72 [1][2][3]. Technical Performance - The GPT-5.2 model showed strong understanding and application of specialized knowledge, scoring full marks on multiple-choice and single-page questions, but struggled with cross-page questions, indicating limitations in maintaining coherent understanding across different contexts [4][5]. - The model's performance highlighted its inability to effectively integrate information dispersed across multiple pages, revealing a core limitation in current AI systems regarding global cognition and working memory [4][5]. Educational Assessment Challenges - The experiment prompted discussions in the education sector about the need to rethink assessment methods, as AI tools challenge the traditional assumption that students independently apply knowledge [7]. - Experts suggest that educational evaluation should shift focus from knowledge reproduction to problem definition, innovative solution design, and the ability to collaborate with AI tools [7][8]. Ethical and Equity Considerations - The proliferation of AI-assisted learning tools raises concerns about educational equity, as access to quality AI resources may initially benefit well-resourced schools and students, potentially widening the educational gap [9]. - Institutions are revising academic integrity policies to clarify the acceptable use of AI, emphasizing that AI should serve as an auxiliary tool rather than a means for academic dishonesty [9][11]. Regulatory and Policy Recommendations - The research team advocates for immediate action from educators and policymakers to establish reasonable regulatory frameworks that ensure technology serves ethical purposes [11]. - The goal is to balance technological advancement with moral considerations, ensuring that educational technology fosters innovation while maintaining academic integrity [11].