Group 1 - The article discusses the perception that no country genuinely likes China, attributing this to the belief that following China offers no benefits compared to aligning with the U.S. [2] - It argues that China's industrialization is a result of hard work by its population, not something taken from others, and blames the failure of other countries' industrialization on their own shortcomings rather than China's success [4][5] - The article highlights a dichotomy between countries that prefer Western influence for quick financial gains versus those that see China's approach as focused on long-term development and infrastructure building [7] Group 2 - It emphasizes that the global issues of hunger and poverty stem from distorted wealth distribution rather than a lack of industrial capacity, pointing out that some nations have chosen a path of dependency and quick fixes instead of sustainable development [10] - The article asserts that the core issue is not whether China has "stolen" industrial opportunities, but rather that many countries have lost the will and ability to build their own economies due to historical and systemic factors [12] - It concludes that China's development is a product of its people's efforts and that the country is willing to share its experiences without accepting blame for the failures of others [12]
“中国害我们当不成牛马!”全球工业化失败,这口黑锅我们不背
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-12-27 07:08