欧盟为何不同意向乌克兰提供“赔偿贷款”?
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-12-27 16:43

Core Viewpoint - The European Union's attempts to seize frozen Russian central bank assets have faced significant setbacks, primarily due to the high costs and risks involved, leading to ongoing delays in progress [1][4][5]. Group 1: EU's Actions and Reactions - The total amount of frozen Russian assets by Western countries since the start of the military operation in 2022 is estimated at approximately $300 billion, with over two-thirds located within the EU [4]. - The EU Commission has been pressuring member states to agree on using these frozen assets, but many countries view such actions as economically detrimental [3][5]. - The EU Commission's proposal to use Russian assets for compensatory loans to Ukraine has faced strong opposition from several member states, particularly Belgium, which has expressed concerns over the legality and risks involved [6][9][10]. Group 2: Belgium's Position - Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo has openly criticized the idea of seizing frozen Russian assets, labeling it as unprecedented and risky, and has emphasized the potential repercussions from Moscow [10][11]. - A significant majority of the Belgian public (67%) opposes transferring Russian assets to Ukraine, reflecting a broader skepticism among EU member states regarding the compensatory loan proposal [18]. - The Belgian government has firmly rejected the EU Commission's plans, insisting on finding alternative methods to support Ukraine without compromising national financial security [24][25]. Group 3: Broader EU Dynamics - A coalition of seven EU countries has emerged, committed to preventing the seizure of Russian assets, indicating a growing divide within the EU on this issue [22]. - The EU Commission has had to adjust its stance, proposing to share financial guarantees among member states, but this has not garnered significant support [14][24]. - The ongoing debate has highlighted the challenges the EU faces in balancing support for Ukraine with the legal and financial implications of using frozen Russian assets [28][30].

欧盟为何不同意向乌克兰提供“赔偿贷款”? - Reportify