统一裁判尺度 最高人民法院发布《商事仲裁司法审查年度报告（2024）》

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court emphasizes the importance of arbitration as an effective method for resolving commercial disputes, promoting international economic cooperation, and enhancing the market-oriented legal environment in China [1] Group 1: Arbitration Judicial Review Report 2024 - In 2024, a total of 18,566 commercial arbitration judicial review cases were concluded by courts nationwide, including 5,475 cases for confirming the validity of arbitration agreements and 11,016 cases for revoking arbitration awards [1] - The revocation rate for arbitration awards was maintained at a low level of 2.22%, with only 245 cases being revoked or partially revoked [1] - The support rate for arbitration preservation cases was high at 98.90%, with 26,770 out of 27,069 cases supported by the courts [1] Group 2: Cross-Strait Judicial Cooperation - In 2024, 62 cases involving the recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards from Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan were concluded, with 53 cases being recognized and enforced [2] - This indicates the mainland courts' support for resolving cross-border commercial disputes through arbitration, enhancing economic cooperation with Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan [2] Group 3: Multilateralism and Foreign Arbitration - A total of 42 cases involving the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards were concluded, with no cases rejected [2] - The courts demonstrated a commitment to multilateralism and accurate application of the New York Convention, supporting international commercial arbitration [2] Group 4: Principles of Arbitration Judicial Review - The report outlines principles for judicial review of arbitration, emphasizing the interpretation that favors the validity of arbitration agreements [3] - Courts strictly apply the grounds for revocation and non-enforcement of arbitration awards to maintain the finality of arbitration decisions [3] - The principle of good faith in treaty performance is followed, with a stance that favors the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards [3]