AI 替代岗位，构成违法解雇？｜南财合规周报

Group 1: AI and Copyright Issues - A group of six authors, including John Carreyrou, has filed a lawsuit against six AI companies, alleging unauthorized use of copyrighted books for training large models [2] - In a previous case, Anthropic settled for $1.5 billion after being found guilty of similar copyright infringement, with eligible authors receiving approximately $3,000 each [2] - The current lawsuit emphasizes that large language model companies should not easily settle high-value infringement claims at a low cost [2] Group 2: Labor Law and AI - Beijing's labor arbitration case determined that terminating an employee due to their position being replaced by AI constitutes illegal dismissal [3] - The case involved an employee whose role in data collection was eliminated as the company transitioned to an AI-driven model [3] - The arbitration committee ruled that the company's attempt to transfer the costs and risks of technological change to the employee was invalid [3] Group 3: AI Emotional Support Regulations - The National Internet Information Office proposed new regulations for AI emotional support services, focusing on user interaction and data protection [4] - The draft requires clear identification of non-human interactions and mandates user alerts after two hours of continuous use [5] - It also stipulates that systems must detect emotional distress and involve human intervention in extreme cases, ensuring the protection of minors and vulnerable users [5] Group 4: Cybersecurity Concerns - OpenAI acknowledged the challenges in defending its AI browser, Atlas, against prompt injection attacks, despite implementing new security measures [7] - The company has created automated attackers to identify vulnerabilities, but admits that certain types of attacks may never be fully resolved [7] - Kuaishou experienced a significant security breach, leading to a temporary shutdown of its live streaming feature and a subsequent drop in stock price by over 3% [10]