特朗普全国讲话“变脸”！罕见读稿不嬉笑，内容却让核查员崩溃？

Core Viewpoint - Trump's recent national address marks a significant shift in his speaking style, moving from a spontaneous and passionate approach to a more serious and scripted delivery, reflecting the pressures his administration is currently facing [1][3]. Group 1: Speech Style and Context - On December 17, Trump's 18-minute address was broadcasted live by major TV networks, contrasting sharply with his usual informal style, as he read from a script with a serious demeanor [3]. - The change in style is attributed to the high stakes of the address, typically reserved for major policy announcements or national crises, amid significant governance challenges [4]. Group 2: Economic Challenges - Recent polls indicate that only 33% of American adults support Trump's economic policies, marking the lowest approval rating since his second term began, with a notable 8% drop among his core supporters since April [4]. - The unemployment rate rose to 4.6% in November, the highest since October 2021, with 7.83 million unemployed, highlighting the economic difficulties faced by the administration [4]. Group 3: Speech Content and Controversies - Trump attributed the current economic struggles to the previous Biden administration, claiming he inherited a "mess" and is working to fix it, despite being in office for nearly a year [6]. - He attempted to reassure the public about economic recovery, claiming "inflation has stopped" and promising significant improvements by 2026, although these statements were met with skepticism and fact-checking [8]. - The introduction of the "warrior bonus" plan, which proposes $1,776 payments to 1.45 million military personnel funded by tariffs, has raised concerns about the legality of the tariffs being challenged in court [9]. Group 4: Policy Focus - The speech largely avoided foreign policy issues, focusing instead on domestic economic concerns, including a brief mention of ending eight wars since taking office [11]. - Trump's push for a new Federal Reserve chair to lower interest rates aligns with his desire for a more accommodative monetary policy to stimulate the economy [13]. - The administration's approach to the national debt leans towards increased spending and revenue generation through tariffs, contrasting with traditional views advocating for debt reduction [15].